Interface:Out lines

We build on propositional logic and first-order logic (including equality):

 param (CLASSICAL Interface:Classical_propositional_calculus ) param (FIRSTORDER Interface:First-order_logic_with_quantifiability (CLASSICAL) ) 

The kind, defined in first-order logic, represents a point. We do not directly have a concept of lines, angles, or circles (nor can these be defined in the obvious way as sets of points, as this is a first-order theory).  kindbind (object point) var (point x y z w u v A B C D E P Q R S X Y) var (point x′ y′ z′ u′ A′ B′ C′ D′)

var (variable a b c a′ b′ c′ e f p) var (formula antecedent) 

Congruence of line segments
We introduce congruence of line segments;  means that the line segment   is the same length as the line segment. This property is also known as equidistance.  term (formula (≡ point point point point)) 

There are a variety of ways of expressing the idea that congruence is not affected by the order in which we list the line segment's endpoints.  stmt (CongruenceLeftCommutativity  ((x y ≡ z w) ↔ (y x ≡ z w))) stmt (CongruenceRightCommutativity  ((x y ≡ z w) ↔ (x y ≡ w z))) stmt (CongruenceCommutativity  ((x y ≡ z w) ↔ (y x ≡ w z)))

stmt (commuteCongruenceLeftInConsequent ((antecedent → (x y ≡ z w)))  (antecedent → (y x ≡ z w))) stmt (commuteCongruenceRightInConsequent ((antecedent → (x y ≡ z w)))  (antecedent → (x y ≡ w z))) stmt (commuteCongruenceInConsequent ((antecedent → (x y ≡ z w)))  (antecedent → (y x ≡ w z))) 

The congruence relation has the attributes of an equivalence relation between line segments.  stmt (CongruenceReflexivity  (x y ≡ x y)) stmt (CongruenceSymmetry  ((x y ≡ z w) ↔ (z w ≡ x y))) stmt (CongruenceTransitivity  (((x y ≡ z w) ∧ (z w ≡ u v)) → (x y ≡ u v)))

stmt (CongruenceABBA  (x y ≡ y x)) stmt (swapCongruenceInConsequent ((antecedent → (x y ≡ z w)))  (antecedent → (z w ≡ x y))) 

A segment which has zero length starts and ends at the same point (although saying "zero length" is a bit of a shortcut, as our theory is not based on real numbers or any other numbers).  stmt (CongruenceIdentity  ((x y ≡ z z) → (x = y))) stmt (CongruenceIdentityLeft  ((x x ≡ y z) → (y = z))) stmt (CongruenceTrivialIdentity  (y y ≡ x x)) stmt (CongruenceIdentityFromEquality  (((x = y) ∧ (x y ≡ z w)) → (z = w))) stmt (NegatedCongruenceIdentityFromEquality   (((A ≠ B) ∧ (A B ≡ C D)) → (C ≠ D))) 

Betweenness
The other fundamental formula is betweenness;  signifies "y is between x and z".

 term (formula (between point point point)) 

There are no points between a point and itself.  stmt (IndivisibilityBiconditional  ((between x y x) ↔ (x = y))) stmt (IndivisibilityFromEquality  (((x = z) ∧ (between x y z)) → (x = y))) 

A point is between itself and any second point.  stmt (BetweenABB  (between A B B)) stmt (BetweenAAB  (between A A B)) </jh>

In addition, this situation (a point is between itself and another) is the only way that betweenness can hold both as-is and with the first two points exchanged.  stmt (BetweennessEquality  (((between A B C) ∧ (between B A C)) → (A = B))) </jh>

The two endpoints of a betweenness relation are interchangeable.  stmt (BetweennessSymmetry  ((between A B C) ↔ (between C B A)))

stmt (swapBetweennessInConsequent ((antecedent → (between A B C)))  (antecedent → (between C B A))) </jh>

Transitivity
In this section we present six similar theorems which involve four points on a line. Given two betweenness relationships, we conclude a third. Three of the six are just versions of the other three which are flipped left-to-right.  stmt (BetweennessInnerTransitivity   (((between A B D) ∧ (between B C D)) → (between A B C))) stmt (BetweennessInnerTransitivityFlipped   (((between A B C) ∧ (between A C D)) → (between B C D)))

stmt (BetweennessOuterTransitivity   ((((between A B C) ∧ (between B C D)) ∧ (B ≠ C)) → (between A B D))) stmt (BetweennessOuterTransitivityFlipped   ((((between A B C) ∧ (between B C D)) ∧ (B ≠ C)) → (between A C D)))

stmt (BetweennessMiddleTransitivity   (((between A B D) ∧ (between B C D)) → (between A C D))) stmt (BetweennessMiddleTransitivityFlipped   (((between A B C) ∧ (between A C D)) → (between A B D))) </jh>

Connectivity
 stmt (BetweennessOuterConnectivity   ((((A ≠ B) ∧ (between A B C)) ∧ (between A B D)) → ((between A C D) ∨ (between A D C)))) stmt (BetweennessMiddleConnectivity   ((((A ≠ B) ∧ (between A B C)) ∧ (between A B D)) → ((between B C D) ∨ (between B D C)))) stmt (BetweennessInnerConnectivity   (((between A B D) ∧ (between A C D)) → ((between A B C) ∨ (between A C B)))) </jh>

Segment construction
A line segment can be extended beyond one of its endpoints by a specified distance (where by "distance" we mean a second line segment, which the constructed segment is to be congruent to). The segment extended this way is unique.  stmt (SegmentConstruction ((a w) (a x) (a y) (a z))  (∃ a ((between w x (value a)) ∧ (x (value a) ≡ y z)))) stmt (SegmentConstructionUniqueness   ((((((Q ≠ A) ∧ (between Q A x)) ∧ (A x ≡ B C)) ∧ (between Q A y)) ∧ (A y ≡ B C)) → (x = y))) </jh>

Here is a similar construction, but from one of the given endpoints towards the other one, rather than away from it.  stmt (InnerSegmentConstruction ((p Q) (p A) (p B) (p C))   (∃ p (((between Q A (value p)) ∨ (between Q (value p) A)) ∧ (Q (value p) ≡ B C)))) </jh>

Inequality of line segments
The formula  means that the line segment   is shorter than (or the same length as) the line segment.  term (formula (≤ point point point point)) def ((≥ A B C D) (C D ≤ A B)) </jh>

There are two equivalent ways of expressing this concept in terms of congruence. We can either cut off  with a point   such that , or we can extend   to a point   such that.  stmt (LessEqualCutoff ((e A) (e B) (e C) (e D))   ((A B ≤ C D) ↔ (∃ e ((between C (value e) D) ∧ (A B ≡ C (value e)))))) stmt (LessEqualExtension ((f A) (f B) (f C) (f D))   ((A B ≤ C D) ↔ (∃ f ((between A B (value f)) ∧ (A (value f) ≡ C D))))) </jh>

Given congruences between two pairs of line segments, a  relationship between the first pair carries over to the second pair.  stmt (LessEqualCongruence   ((((A B ≤ C D) ∧ (A B ≡ A′ B′)) ∧ (C D ≡ C′ D′)) → (A′ B′ ≤ C′ D′))) </jh>

Total order
It has the properties of a total order:  var (point A0 A1 B0 B1 C0 C1) stmt (LessEqualTransitivity  (((A0 A1 ≤ B0 B1) ∧ (B0 B1 ≤ C0 C1)) → (A0 A1 ≤ C0 C1))) stmt (LessEqualAntisymmetry  (((A0 A1 ≤ B0 B1) ∧ (B0 B1 ≤ A0 A1)) → (A0 A1 ≡ B0 B1))) stmt (LessEqualTotality  ((A0 A1 ≤ B0 B1) ∨ (B0 B1 ≤ A0 A1))) </jh>

A number of other properties follow from those.  stmt (LessEqualReflexivity  (A0 A1 ≤ A0 A1))

def ((< A0 A1 B0 B1) ((A0 A1 ≤ B0 B1) ∧ (¬ (A0 A1 ≡ B0 B1)))) def ((> B0 B1 A0 A1) (A0 A1 < B0 B1)) </jh>

Empty segments and inequality
 stmt (ZeroSmallest  (A A ≤ B C)) stmt (LessEqualZero  ((A B ≤ C C) → (A = B))) </jh>

Collinearity
To say that three points are collinear is just to say that one of them is between the other two (in any order).  def ((collinear x y z) (((between x y z) ∨ (between y z x)) ∨ (between z x y))) stmt (BetweennessCollinearity  ((between x y z) → (collinear x y z))) stmt (CollinearityRotation  ((collinear x y z) ↔ (collinear y z x))) stmt (Collinearity23  ((collinear x y z) ↔ (collinear x z y))) stmt (Collinearity12  ((collinear x y z) ↔ (collinear y x z))) stmt (Collinearity13  ((collinear x y z) ↔ (collinear z y x))) </jh>

A point, itself, and any second point are collinear.  stmt (CollinearityAAB  (collinear A A B)) stmt (CollinearityABB  (collinear A B B)) stmt (CollinearityABA  (collinear A B A)) </jh>

Transitivity
These three theorems are all variations of the same theme, which is that given two collinear predicates sharing two unequal points, all four points are collinear. The words "outer" and "inner" do not signify a fundamentally different theorem (as they do for betweenness or five segment); they just refer to a minor rearrangement.  stmt (CollinearityOuterTransitivity   ((((P ≠ Q) ∧ (collinear P Q A)) ∧ (collinear P Q B)) → (collinear P A B))) stmt (CollinearityInnerTransitivity   ((((P ≠ Q) ∧ (collinear P Q A)) ∧ (collinear P Q B)) → (collinear Q A B))) stmt (CollinearityCollinearity   ((((P ≠ Q) ∧ (S ≠ P)) ∧ (collinear S P Q)) → ((collinear X P Q) ↔ (collinear X P S)))) </jh>

Determining lines, or points, by distance to two points
If two given points are equidistant to each of two distinct points on a line, they are equidistant to every point on that line. <jh> stmt (EquidistantLine   (((((A ≠ B) ∧ (collinear A B C)) ∧ (A P ≡ A Q)) ∧ (B P ≡ B Q)) → (C P ≡ C Q))) </jh>

On a given line, the distance to two points can uniquely determine a point. We have two versions: one in which the two given points are distinct, and one in which they are endpoints of a line segment on which the point lies. <jh> stmt (CollinearTwoDistanceUniqueness   (((((A ≠ B) ∧ (collinear A B C)) ∧ (A C ≡ A C′)) ∧ (B C ≡ B C′)) → (C = C′))) stmt (BetweennessTwoDistanceUniqueness  ((((between A C B) ∧ (A C ≡ A C′)) ∧ (B C ≡ B C′)) → (C = C′))) </jh>

For the previous theorems, two distances are needed because the point  is not known to be on the line containing ,  , and. If we know that the points which are to be shown equal are on the same line, and the same side of the point, then one congruence suffices. <jh> stmt (BetweennessOneDistanceUniqueness   (((between A B C) ∧ (A B ≡ A C)) → (B = C))) stmt (SameSegmentOneDistanceUniqueness   ((((between A D B) ∧ (between A E B)) ∧ (A D ≡ A E)) → (D = E))) </jh>

Triangle congruence defined
At least for now, we define triangle congruence here (rather than provide a theorem providing this definition, which corresponds to the familiar side-side-side property of triangle congruence). The definition allows degenerate triangles: the points may be collinear, and need not all be distinct from each other. <jh> def ((≅ x y z x′ y′ z′) (((x y ≡ x′ y′) ∧ (x z ≡ x′ z′)) ∧ (y z ≡ y′ z′))) </jh> The corresponding sides of congruent (possibly degenerate) triangles are congruent. <jh> stmt (Congruence12  ((A B C ≅ A′ B′ C′) → (A B ≡ A′ B′))) stmt (Congruence23  ((A B C ≅ A′ B′ C′) → (B C ≡ B′ C′))) stmt (Congruence13  ((A B C ≅ A′ B′ C′) → (A C ≡ A′ C′))) </jh>

Rotate the order of points in a triangle congruence. <jh> stmt (CongruenceRotation  ((A B C ≅ A′ B′ C′) ↔ (B C A ≅ B′ C′ A′))) </jh>

Five segment
The five segment theorems are variations of the familiar congruences for triangles (although without any explicit reference to angles). <jh> stmt (OuterFiveSegment   ((((((((x ≠ y) ∧ (between x y z)) ∧ (between x′ y′ z′)) ∧ (x y ≡ x′ y′)) ∧ (y z ≡ y′ z′)) ∧ (x u ≡ x′ u′)) ∧ (y u ≡ y′ u′)) → (z u ≡ z′ u′)) ) stmt (InnerFiveSegment   (((((((between x y z) ∧ (between x′ y′ z′)) ∧ (x z ≡ x′ z′)) ∧ (y z ≡ y′ z′)) ∧ (x u ≡ x′ u′)) ∧ (z u ≡ z′ u′)) → (y u ≡ y′ u′))) stmt (FiveSegment   ((((((A ≠ B) ∧ (collinear A B C)) ∧ (A B C ≅ A′ B′ C′)) ∧ (A D ≡ A′ D′)) ∧ (B D ≡ B′ D′)) → (C D ≡ C′ D′))) </jh>

Three segment
The three segment theorems can be thought of as degenerate cases of five segment, or as basic properties of points on a line. <jh> stmt (OuterThreeSegment   (((((between x y z) ∧ (between x′ y′ z′)) ∧ (x y ≡ x′ y′)) ∧ (y z ≡ y′ z′)) → (x z ≡ x′ z′))) stmt (InnerThreeSegment   (((((between x y z) ∧ (between x′ y′ z′)) ∧ (x z ≡ x′ z′)) ∧ (y z ≡ y′ z′)) → (x y ≡ x′ y′))) </jh>

Some degenerate triangle congruence theorems
<jh> stmt (BetweennessDegenerateTriangle    (((between A B C) ∧ (A B C ≅ A′ B′ C′)) → (between A′ B′ C′))) stmt (CollinearityDegenerateTriangle   (((collinear A B C) ∧ (A B C ≅ A′ B′ C′)) → (collinear A′ B′ C′))) stmt (InnerDegenerateTriangle ((b′ A) (b′ B) (b′ C) (b′ A′) (b′ C′))   (((between A B C) ∧ (A C ≡ A′ C′)) → (∃ b′ ((between A′ (value b′) C′) ∧ (A B C ≅ A′ (value b′) C′))))) stmt (CollinearityConstructDegenerateTriangle ((c′ A) (c′ B) (c′ C) (c′ A′) (c′ B′))   (((collinear A B C) ∧ (A B ≡ A′ B′)) → (∃ c′ (A B C ≅ A′ B′ (value c′))))) </jh>

Out lines
We say that  if the point   is on the line   outside the line segment. This statement is equivalent to several different formulas.

<jh> term (formula (is-outside point point point))

stmt (OutBetweenness  ((P is-outside A B) ↔ (((A ≠ P) ∧ (B ≠ P)) ∧ ((between P A B) ∨ (between P B A)))))

stmt (ExistsBeyondOut ((c A) (c B) (c P))  ((P is-outside A B) ↔ (((A ≠ P) ∧ (B ≠ P)) ∧     (∃ c ((((value c) ≠ P) ∧ (between A P (value c))) ∧       (between B P (value c)))))))

stmt (OutCollinearity  ((P is-outside A B) ↔ ((collinear A P B) ∧ (¬ (between A P B))))) </jh>

The following theorem relates  to a point   which is beyond. <jh> stmt (BeyondOut  (((((A ≠ P) ∧ (B ≠ P)) ∧ (C ≠ P)) ∧ (between A P C)) → ((between B P C) ↔ (P is-outside A B)))) </jh>

Here we present versions of reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. You can think of this as dividing a line (excluding the point  itself) into two equivalence classes: those to the left of   and those to the right (although we don't state it exactly that way). <jh> stmt (OutReflexivity  ((A ≠ P) → (P is-outside A A))) stmt (OutSymmetry  ((P is-outside A B) ↔ (P is-outside B A))) stmt (OutTransitivity  (((P is-outside A B) ∧ (P is-outside B C)) → (P is-outside A C))) </jh>

Here is an additional line segment construction theorem, which involves. <jh> stmt (OutSegmentConstruction ((e R) (e A) (e B) (e C))  (((R ≠ A) ∧ (B ≠ C)) → (∃ e ((A is-outside (value e) R) ∧ (A (value e) ≡ B C))))) stmt (OutSegmentConstructionUniqueness    (((((((R ≠ A) ∧ (B ≠ C)) ∧ (A is-outside X R)) ∧ (A X ≡ B C)) ∧ (A is-outside Y R)) ∧ (A Y ≡ B C)) → (X = Y))) </jh>

If  and   are on a line with , both on the same side of  , then   is closer to   than   is if and only if   is between   and. <jh> stmt (LessEqualBetween   ((P is-outside A B) → ((P A ≤ P B) ↔ (between P A B)))) </jh>

Existence of distinct points
Here we can construct a point distinct from a given point, or a point distinct from a given point extended along a given line segment. <jh> stmt (PointConstructionDifferent ((c A) (c B))  (∃ c ((between A B (value c)) ∧ (B ≠ (value c))))) stmt (AnotherPoint ((b A)) (∃ b (A ≠ (value b)))) </jh>

There exist three non-collinear points. <jh> stmt (LowerDimensionCollinearity ((a b c))  (∃ a (∃ b (∃ c (¬ (collinear (value a) (value b) (value c))))))) </jh>

Given a line, there is a point which is not on that line. <jh> stmt (PointNotOnLine ((c A) (c B))  ((A ≠ B) → (∃ c (¬ (collinear A B (value c)))))) </jh>

Intersecting lines
If two distinct, non-degenerate lines intersect, they intersect in a single point.

<jh> stmt (LineIntersection   (((((((¬ (collinear A B C)) ∧ (C ≠ D)) ∧ (collinear A B P)) ∧ (collinear A B Q)) ∧ (collinear C D P)) ∧ (collinear C D Q)) → (P = Q))) </jh>

Given two intersecting line segments, where the portions of each segment on the sides of the intersection are congruent, the segments drawn from the endpoints of one line segment to the endpoints of the other are congruent. <jh> stmt (IntersectionCongruence   (((((between A B C) ∧ (between D B E)) ∧ (A B ≡ D B)) ∧ (B C ≡ B E)) → (A E ≡ C D))) </jh>

Tarski's axioms
We repeat those axioms which are not subsumed by the theorems we have proved so far. Explanations are at Interface:Tarski's geometry axioms. <jh> stmt (Pasch ((a x) (a u) (a z) (a y) (a v)) (((between x u z) ∧ (between y v z)) → (∃ a ((between u (value a) y) ∧ (between v (value a) x))))) var (formula φx ψy) var (variable xx yy) stmt (Continuity ((φx yy) (φx a) (φx b) (ψy xx) (ψy a) (ψy b) (a b xx yy))   ((∃ a (∀ xx (∀ yy ((φx ∧ ψy) → (between (value a) (value xx) (value yy)))))) → (∃ b (∀ xx (∀ yy ((φx ∧ ψy) → (between (value xx) (value b) (value yy)))))))) stmt (UpperDimension   (((((x u ≡ x v) ∧ (y u ≡ y v)) ∧ (z u ≡ z v)) ∧ (u ≠ v)) → (((between x y z) ∨ (between y z x)) ∨ (between z x y)))) stmt (AxiomEuclid ((a b x) (a b u) (a b v) (a b y) (a b z)) ( (((between x u v) ∧ (between y u z)) ∧ (x ≠ u)) → (∃ a (∃ b (((between x y (value a)) ∧ (between x z (value b))) ∧ (between (value a) v (value b))))))) </jh>

Builders
As usual, we need to state that equals can be substituted for equals via builders. <jh> var (point x0 x1 x2 x3 y0 y1 y2 y3) stmt (CongruenceBuilder  ( ((((x0 = y0) ∧ (x1 = y1)) ∧ (x2 = y2)) ∧ (x3 = y3)) → ((x0 x1 ≡ x2 x3) ↔ (y0 y1 ≡ y2 y3)) )) stmt (BetweennessBuilder  ( (((x0 = y0) ∧ (x1 = y1)) ∧ (x2 = y2)) → ((between x0 x1 x2) ↔ (between y0 y1 y2)) )) stmt (CollinearityBuilder  ( (((x0 = y0) ∧ (x1 = y1)) ∧ (x2 = y2)) → ((collinear x0 x1 x2) ↔ (collinear y0 y1 y2)) )) stmt (LessEqualBuilder  ( ((((x0 = y0) ∧ (x1 = y1)) ∧ (x2 = y2)) ∧ (x3 = y3)) → ((x0 x1 ≤ x2 x3) ↔ (y0 y1 ≤ y2 y3)) )) </jh>